Communications with MP

Evidence and Supporting Details.

The majority of the situation came into effect with the MP prior to Sally-Anne Hart who took over Amber Rudd’s MP role destroying all correspondence documents she was involved in. After it was publicized on Researching Reform it was a story published in Scotland UK Government responsible for forced adoptions in the 1950s to the 1970s, researcher says. Lambert researches a range of issues including housing and homelessness, child protection and social work, and non-recent forced adoption. He also submitted evidence to the 2021-22 Joint Committee on Human Rights inquiry into the forced adoption of children of unmarried mothers from 1949 to 1976.

You can access Lambert’s article here.

The first time a Post-Separation Crisis case went public was in the 1830’s in England, nearly two centuries ago. It led to the passage of the Custody of Infants Act—the first that supposedly gave mothers the right to maintain custody after separation—until they turned 7.

But that was an illusion.

In recent news it was published in the USA

It is ubiquitous to me that after writing a trilogy of books about the previous lack of candor or attitude I am in a position of twelve years to write that the state of the nation you have created is in disarray and without lawful behavior quite frankly I asked you to raise this matter of the cohort of parents which should have not gone through family court spelt out by the Chancellor in his Financial Statement and Budget Report in Parliament as reported on Hansard Volume 746: debated on Wednesday 6 March 2024 at 12.32 pm:
“Too many legal cases, particularly in family law, should never go to court, and it would cost us less if they did not, so we will spend £170 million to fund non-court resolution, reduce reoffending and digitise the court process. Too many children in care end up being looked after by unregistered providers that are much more expensive, so we will invest £165 million over the next four years to reduce that cost by increasing the capacity of the children’s homes estate.”

This seems an unfair process then which already outlined to your office is responsible for allowing more than half a million children to be estranged from their parents and even moved more than 200 miles away from their family to another shore in Northern Ireland rather than admit what you done in a hypocritical move the employment of a person non-fit for purpose as the interim director of children services is unlawfully not handling his information questions even though Lord Falconer said that everyone in office should.

It seems the social work that was used, encumbered to snatch Emily, was clearly deeply flawed. It is apparent from your request that none of the male lineages of the family was done when she was four and snatched. Are you having sequential problems with Emily that are mental or devisory capacity? It is a bit late to ask for this information and are you trying to attribute any of her characteristics that have formed along this are you trying to ensure that these parameters for the type are correct? The script being used is the same as the postal Standard but involves children who are unable to protect themselves. Emily has been cheated out of her childhood. How is she going to trust another man based on your education of her mindset concerning her father? What statistics show how many of these children are disabled or disfigured? What is the means of learning they are using to predate these children? What is their mandate for the children seized, and why are they being singled out? Is there a leaning of these figures to be more female children or males, with blonde hair, blue eyes etc? To brainwash a child with a different set of what a parent perceives is brainwashing. Nobody is named as a line manager or social work manager beggars’ belief. Do they go into parental lineage and is this why you are asking for my family story to predate more children from Emily’s family who are a similar group to these children that have all been target areas? I can inform you of the generic questions which are being discussed here available on all genealogy websites to which I subscribe. What if Emily does a Genealogy DNA test on one site and cannot get proper information as the registers have been corrupted / tracked / adjusted? I am informed that Emily’s schooling and further education have been mapped out enabling the continuation of the CARE ORDER which has never been provided to me. It is clear that there is a parental perception that this Local Authority has intentions of keeping Emily in Care until she is 21. It is clear from Sinead O’Connor’s well-documented background that she was out of the system and any potential Care associated with her case and adrift at 16-17. What this has been suggesting for forty years is drastically wrong and misaligned wrong that Emily is not coming out of the Trusts overreaching and over-actively destroying her life. None of this suggests Emily is well and looked after and they are trying to probably attribute it to her paternal family. This Trust in Northern Ireland has contrived with many organizations to there are many comparable public news stories and this trust seems to have jumped off a cliff or under a bus in the same way as St Patrick’s Guild and Sisters of Mercy which it has contrived and which allegedly buried children in their car parks.

Clearly, the life and work of Rose Dugdale, English debutante turned IRA bomb maker, who dies aged 83 [1] is now being celebrated “Bridget Rose was the middle child. Despite her first name she had no immediate Irish ancestry and was known as Rose. She attended Miss Ironside’s school for girls in Kensington.” Am I to understand this is the life you want for these children including my daughter Emily?
Priscilla of The Children’s Society wrote Wednesday, 20 March 2024 at 16:30:20 GMT “The longer children have to wait for support, the worse their situation gets.” What are you waiting for?

Can you please contact Lord Falkner and inform him this trust in Northern Ireland is not acting in accordance with his direction to act on FOI?

Can you please contact Jeremy Hunt and ask him to clearly define this cohort he described in his Financial Statement and Budget Report in Parliament as reported on Hansard Volume 746: debated on Wednesday 6 March 2024 at 12.32 pm and provide the documents he was referring to in his address to explicitly show that these parents can be no longer victims of this unlawful family court.

[1] https://www.aol.co.uk/news/rose-dugdale-english-heiress-turned-165817262.html